ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+6581%
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
2880
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GK180
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
