Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GX2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (17W vs 197W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GX2 +380%
0.384 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
80
Shading Units
128
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

17W
TDP
197W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
G92
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
G92-450-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net