ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FirePro W4300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
+1685%
1.428 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Bonaire
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
