ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FirePro W4100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
+706%
0.645 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
