ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (17W vs 43W)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
+550%
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
400
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Redwood
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
