ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FirePro S9050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050
+3932%
3.226 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
