ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
10672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe
+46675%
37.42 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
84
80
Shading Units
10752
8
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GA102
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
