ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X1050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 32W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
24W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV410
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.12 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
