ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 9060 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock3230MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (322.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 9060 XT
+82587%
26.46 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2025
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2220 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3230 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
322.3GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
48
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.7 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
413.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.92 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.46 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
826.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 44
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 44 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
