ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2755MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7600 XT
+70431%
22.57 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2755 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.3 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
352.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
45.14 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.57 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
705.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 33
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XT
(215-163000047)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
