ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 107W)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2815MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
+17915%
5.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
107W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
