ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 5600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5600 XT
+22362%
7.188 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1130 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.38 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.188 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 10
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XLE
(215-0917338)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
