ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300
+14375%
4.632 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1408
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
