ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 390
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 390
+15900%
5.12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.120 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Grenada
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Grenada PRO
(215-0880030)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
