ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro VII
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro VII to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro VII 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro VII
+40712%
13.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
3840
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
408.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.11 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.528 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Vega 20
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS
(215-0914026)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
