ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S80
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 255W)
Moore Threads MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
MTT S80
+45993%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
256
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
255W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
22 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
