ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 55W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750
+3371%
1.111 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1111 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GM107
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GM107-300-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
