ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 49W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.06GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
+2409%
0.803 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
40.06GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.368 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
803.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.47 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GK208
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GK208-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
