ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro W9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100
+16268%
5.238 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
