ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro W8000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
+9981%
3.226 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
