ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
+1818%
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Cayman
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
