ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
+1837%
0.62 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
400
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Redwood
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
