ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+24859%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Capsaicin
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.0
