ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX 8 GB
+39368%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1.49TB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
40
Shading Units
4480
4
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GA100
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
