ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
NVS 315
+212%
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
40
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GF119
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
