ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
+3981%
1.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
54.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
108.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
170W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GF114
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
