Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W7000

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +7500%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
20
40
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy