ATI FirePro 2270 vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2270 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2270
0.096 TFLOPS
RTX A400
+2718%
2.706 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GA107
Cedar WS
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
