Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2270 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro 2270 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2270 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2270
0.096 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +12400%
12 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
80
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
AD107
Cedar WS
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net