ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 30W)
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6
