ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.8
