ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
130 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
-
Shader Model
6.8
