ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
130 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
-
Shader Model
6.7
