ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD Radeon R7 360
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.3
