ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
48 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
-
Shader Model
5.1
