ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs Moore Threads MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 85W)
Moore Threads MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
-
SM Count
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
GPU Variant
Rage 9
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
Unknown
92 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
-
Shader Model
6.5
