ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1019MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
Rage 9
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
-
Shader Model
5.1
