ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Lower TDP (20W vs 31W)
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Rage 9
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
-
Shader Model
4.1
