ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1600
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0
