ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1440
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0
