ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.1
