ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (17W vs 20W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0
