ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2007
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.0
