ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
