ATI FireMV 2250 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2020
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Generation 12.1
UMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
