ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 425W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
14592 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2280 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
114
-
Shading Units
14592
4
TMUs
456
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
456
-
RT Cores
114
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1149 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
73.54 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
73.54 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1149 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
425W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-250-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
