ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages
Released 17 years late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2024
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
66
-
Shading Units
8448
4
TMUs
264
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
AD103-275-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
