ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jul 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
-
Shading Units
32
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
G96B
-
GPU Variant
G96-309-B1
R500
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
UMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
