ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro S9150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
R500
Architecture
GCN 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3
