ATI FireMV 2250 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
R500
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
